How does YouTube combat misinformation?

By | September 8, 2021

YouTube combat misinformation

We address misinformation on our platform with a range of tools: removing content that violates our policies, raising up authoritative sources for news and information, and reducing recommendations of borderline content and harmful misinformation.

What policies exist to fight misinformation on YouTube?

Several policies in our Community Guidelines are directly applicable to misinformation.

The COVID-19 Medical Misinformation policy doesn’t allow content that spreads medical misinformation that contradicts local health authorities’ or the World Health Organization’s (WHO) medical information about COVID-19.

Our guidelines against deceptive practices include tough policies against users that misrepresent themselves or who engage in other deceptive practices. This includes deceptive use of manipulated media (e.g. “deep fakes”) which may pose serious risks of harm. We also work to protect elections from attacks and interference, including focusing on combating political influence operations.

We also have a policy against impersonation. Accounts seeking to spread misinformation by misrepresenting who they are via impersonation are clearly against our policies and will be removed.

And finally, our hate speech policy prohibits content that denies well documented, major violent events took place.

How does YouTube deal with borderline content and harmful misinformation?

Content that comes close to — but doesn’t quite cross the line of — violating our Community Guidelines is a fraction of 1% of what’s watched on YouTube in the U.S. Our recommendations systems do not proactively recommend such content on YouTube, thereby helping limit the spread of borderline content or videos that could misinform users in harmful ways.

See also  How to Watch Youtube Offline

How does YouTube determine what counts as harmful misinformation?

We have careful systems in place to help us determine what is harmful misinformation across the wide variety of videos on YouTube. As part of this, we ask external human evaluators and experts to assess whether content is promoting unsubstantiated conspiracy theories, or inaccurate information. These evaluators are trained using public guidelines and provide critical input on the quality of a video.

Based on the consensus input from the evaluators, we use well-tested machine learning systems to build models that generate recommendations. These models help review hundreds of thousands of hours of videos every day in order to find and limit the spread of harmful misinformation.

How does YouTube provide more quality information to users?

For content where accuracy and authoritativeness are key, including news, politics, medical, and scientific information, we use machine learning systems that prioritize information from authoritative sources in search results and recommendations.

For certain types of content that tend to be accompanied by misinformation online, we have information panels that provide additional information from authoritative third-party sources alongside those videos to give you more context to make informed decisions.

How does YouTube evaluate what is an authoritative source?

We use a number of signals to determine authoritativeness, including inputs from Google Search and Google News such as the relevance and freshness of the content, as well as the expertise of the source, to determine the content you see in our officially-labeled news surfaces. Additionally, we use external raters and experts to provide critical input and guidance on the accuracy of videos.

See also  How does YouTube manage harmful content?

How is misinformation different from disinformation?

It’s important to take into account the content’s creator, as well as their intentions, to decide if that content is disinformation or misinformation. If someone shares false information, then it’s misinformation. If someone is deliberately trying to deceive or mislead people using the speed, scale, and technologies of the internet, then we refer to it as disinformation. Given that disinformation is a subset of misinformation, we use misinformation as a primary term to refer to both throughout this site.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *